Short-Term Effects Of Dry Heat Treatment (Fluidotherapy) In The Management Of Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema: A Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether fluidotherapy added to complete decongestive therapy (CDT) would provide additional contribution to edema reduction in patients with breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirthy-two patients with unilateral BCRL were randomly divided into 2 groups: standard treatment with CDT only (Group 1) and CDT + fluidotherapy (Group 2). All patients underwent phase 1 CDT, which included manual lymphatic drainage, multilayer bandaging, supervised exercises and skin care for a total of 15 sessions, 5 times a week for 3 weeks. Only Group 2 received a total of 15 sessions application of fluidotherapy. Before and after CDT, patients were evaluated for extremity volumes and excess volumes, according to circumferencial measurements of the extremity. Arm pain was evaluated with Visual Analaogue Scale (VAS-Pain). RESULTS: Seventeen patients in Group 1 and 15 patients in Group 2 completed the study. Patients' demographic data and volume measurements were similar at the beginning of the treatment. Limb volumes of both groups were significantly reduced after treatment (P < .001 for both group). Pain significantly decreased (P = .001 for both group). No adverse reactions were recorded. The mean change in volume measurements and VAS-Pain scores of patients in CDT+fluidotherapy group before and after treatment were significantly higher than those in only CDT group (P = .028, P = .020 respectively). CONCLUSION: Fluidotherapy added to CDT reduced pain and edema severity more than standard CDT in the patients with BCRL. As a noninvasive, novel, and effective method, fluidotherapy may be a promising treatment modality for the treatment of lymphedema.

Predictors of Unilateral Arm Lymphedema in Non-obese Locoregionally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Modified Radical Mastectomy, and Postoperative Irradiation.

Objective: The most dreaded long-term complication of axillary lymph node dissection remains upper arm lymphedema. Our study has strategized the three most common identified causes of post treatment arm lymphedema, i.e., obesity, radiation, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy and tried to identify the histopathological and clinical or surgical factors which can predict arm lymphedema. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care referral centre in India, with strict inclusion criteria of BMI <30 kg/m2, age <75 years, presence of metastatic axillary node proven by FNAC, received anthracycline based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and postoperative nodal irradiation, and completed 24 months of regular follow-up. Results: Total of 70 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 50.3 years (±12.9). lymphovascular invasion, total number of lymph nodes removed from level III, total number of days drain was left in situ and maximum drain output were found to be significantly (p<0.05) associated with arm lymphedema. Conclusion: In patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy with level III dissection, and postoperative irradiation, the incidence of unilateral arm lymphedema is significantly influenced by several clinicopathological factors like the total number of lymph nodes removed in level III, higher maximal drain output, prolonged duration of drain placement and the presence of lymphovascular invasion.

Comparison of Volume Measurements and Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Using A Stand-on Device for Assessment of Unilateral Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.

Objective: Breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) may be assessed through objective measurement of limb swelling with common techniques including volumetric measurement using a tape measure or perometry, and measurement of extracellular water using bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a stand-on BIS device for detection of BCRL, introduce a novel graphical method to compare volumetric and BIS methods alongside traditional specificity and sensitivity analysis, and determine and compare BIS thresholds with those published previously. Materials and Methods: Female participants with indocyanine green lymphography confirmed unilateral arm lymphedema (n = 197) and healthy controls (n = 267) were assessed using a cross-sectional study design. BIS and volumetric measures were obtained in a single session. Results: The BIS lymphedema index (L-Dex) method had a significantly higher sensitivity than the excess volume approach (area under the curve = 0.832 vs. 0.649, p = 0.0001). A threshold of L-Dex 6.5 had a higher true positive rate (70.6%) than L-Dex 10 (68.5%) although false positive rate increased from 0.4% to 2.6%. A threshold of 5% excess volume improved the true positive rate (68.5%) compared with 10% excess volume (49.7%) however the false positive rate increased to an unacceptable 47%. The L-Dex ranges in this study were not significantly different from previously published ranges. Conclusion: BIS was superior for identifying BCRL compared with volume measurements, reaffirming the value of this technique. However, it is recommended that BIS be used in conjunction with comprehensive evaluation of symptoms and clinical presentation. The proposed graphical method provides a simple and easily interpretable approach to compare and define concordance between the two commonly used methods for BCRL assessment namely limb volume and BIS L-Dex indices. The existing BIS (L-Dex) thresholds for presence of BCRL were also validated.

Progression of fluid infiltration on non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer-related lymphedema: A comparative analysis with indocyanine green lymphography.

BACKGROUND: Non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (NMRI) has been reported as valuable for the assessment of lymphedema. However, the correlation between NMRI findings and indocyanine green lymphography (ICG-L) findings remains elusive. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 26 patients diagnosed with breast cancer-related lymphedema. We examined the prevalence of fluid infiltration in eight regions of the upper extremity, the type of fluid distribution, and the dominant segment of edema on NMRI in comparison to the ICG-L stage. Statistical analysis was performed using the Cochran-Armitage trend test, Spearman's rank correlation test, and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: The regional fluid infiltration significantly increased with the progression of the ICG-L stage (hand, forearm, elbow, and upper arm: p = 0.003, <0.001, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively). The fluid distribution significantly advanced with the progression of the ICG-L stage as follows (rs = 0.80; p < 0.001): no edema in ICG-L stage 0, edema in either the hand or elbow in ICG-L stage I, edemas in both the elbow and hand in ICG-L stage II, three segmental edemas centered on the forearm or elbow in ICG-L stage III, and edema encompassing the entire upper limb in ICG-L stage IV-V. Additionally, the dominant segment of edema tended to shift from the hand to the elbow and further to the forearm as the ICG-L stage progressed (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Fluid infiltration observed on NMRI exhibited distinct patterns with the progression of the ICG-L stage. We believe that anatomical information regarding fluid distribution would potentially contribute to optimizing surgical efficacy.

Surgical Treatment for Primary Lymphedema: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

This is a retrospective review of surgical management for primary lymphedema. Data were extracted from 55 articles from PubMed MEDLINE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials between the database inception and December 2022 to evaluate the outcomes of lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT), and outcomes of soft tissue extirpative procedures such as suction-assisted lipectomy (SAL) and extensive soft tissue excision. Data from 485 patients were compiled; these were treated with LVA ( n = 177), VLNT ( n = 82), SAL ( n = 102), and excisional procedures ( n = 124). Improvement of the lower extremity lymphedema index, the quality of life (QoL), and lymphedema symptoms were reported in most studies. LVA and VLNT led to symptomatic relief and improved QoL, reaching up to 90 and 61% average circumference reduction, respectively. Cellulitis reduction was reported in 25 and 40% of LVA and VLNT papers, respectively. The extirpative procedures, used mainly in patients with advanced disease, also led to clinical improvement from the volume reduction, as well as reduced incidence of cellulitis, although with poor cosmetic results; 87.5% of these reports recommended postoperative compression garments. The overall complication rates were 1% for LVA, 13% for VLNT, 11% for SAL, and 46% for extirpative procedures. Altogether, only one paper lacked some kind of improvement. Primary lymphedema is amenable to surgical treatment; the currently performed procedures have effectively improved symptoms and QoL in this population. Complication rates are related to the invasiveness of the chosen procedure.

Control of pleural effusion with prednisolone in a patient with yellow nail syndrome: A case report.

Yellow nail syndrome (YNS) can induce bilateral exudative pleural effusion; however, to the best of our knowledge, no standard treatment for YNS has been established. The present study describes a patient with YNS for whom the pleural effusion was controlled by prednisolone. A 73-year-old man was referred to the University of Tsukuba Hospital (Ibaraki, Japan) complaining of shortness of breath, which was diagnosed as being due to bilateral pleural effusion. Based on the presence of yellowing and growth retardation of the toenails, lymphedema, bilateral exudative pleural fluid of unknown etiology, and lymphatic congestion on lymphoscintigraphy, the patient was diagnosed with YNS. The pleural fluid was predominantly lymphocytic and responded to systemic steroid administration [prednisolone 30 mg/day (0.5 mg/kg) for 2 weeks, with subsequent weekly tapering]. The general condition of the patient and their dyspnea also improved with treatment. These findings indicated that systemic steroid administration should be considered as one of the treatment options for patients with YNS who are reluctant to undergo chest drainage or pleurodesis due to the potential for a decrease in their ability to perform daily activities and respiratory function.

Impact of risk factors, early rehabilitation and management of lymphedema associated with breast cancer: a retrospective study of breast Cancer survivors over 5 years.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a potentially disabling and often irreversible consequence of breast cancer treatment, caused by the mechanical incompetence of the lymphatic system, resulting in reduced drainage capacity and functional overload due to an excessive volume of interstitial fluid surpassing the system's transport capacity in the arm. We wanted to determine the impact and explore the differences in independent risk factors for the occurrence of BCRL; incidence of BCRL over a five-year period at the Institute of Oncology Vojvodina in Sremska Kamenica and to answer the research question regarding the influence of the prehabilitation program on the overall incidence of BCRL during the observed five-year period. METHODS: From 2014 to 2018, a retrospective study was conducted at the Institute of Oncology of Vojvodina in Sremska Kamenica, analyzing female patients who had undergone breast cancer surgery. RESULTS: The study included 150 breast cancer patients who developed secondary lymphedema following surgery with the mean age of 59.2 ± 11.3 years. Fluctuations in hospitalization rates were observed over the five-year period, with the highest number of admissions in 2014 (24.0%) and a decline in 2018 (14.0%). The most common surgical procedure performed was left quadrantectomy (24.0%), followed by right quadrantectomy (20.0%) and left amputation (15.3%). The mean number of removed lymph nodes was 15.2 ± 6.1, with no statistically significant association between the number of removed lymph nodes and the manifestation of secondary lymphedema. The severity of secondary lymphedema varied based on patient age, with a higher incidence of moderate and severe lymphedema observed in patients aged 61 years and older. Patients who underwent radical surgery were more likely to experience severe lymphedema compared to those who had conservative surgery, although this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: In our study, the type of surgery, elapsed time since surgery, and the number of removed lymph nodes were not influencing factors for the occurrence of BCRL. However, concerning its severity, a greater number of systemic therapy modalities combined with radiotherapy were associated with a more frequent occurrence of mild and moderate BCRL. Also, the severity of BCRL varied among different age groups, with a higher incidence of moderate and severe lymphedema observed in patients aged 61 years and older. Ultimately, improving the quality of life for individuals affected by secondary lymphedema remains a crucial goal in the field of oncology.

Digital volumetric measurements based on 3D scans of the lower limb: A valid and reproducible method for evaluation in lymphedema therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Exact quantification of volumetric changes of the extremities is difficult and often error prone. The aim of this study was to establish a standardized method based on 3D scans. Furthermore, this study tests the method in terms of reproducibility and evaluates volume changes after surgical therapy in patients suffering from lymphedema on the lower extremity. METHODS: 3D-scans of the lower limb were performed with a mobile 3D-scanner. "repeatability" and "inter-observer reliability" of digital volumetry were tested. Furthermore, the method was applied on 31 patients suffering from chronic lymphedema. RESULTS: Calculations of repeatability of the volume based on 20 3D-scans of the same lower leg showed a mean volume of 2.488 ± 0,011 liters (range: 2.470 - 2.510). The mean volume of the different examiners did not differ significantly (F(2,18) = 1.579, p = .233). The paired t-Test showed a significant mean volume decrease of 375ml (95% CI = 245/505ml) between pre and post treatment (t (30) =5.892, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: 3D-Volumetry is a noninvasive, easy and quick method to assess volume changes of the lower leg. Other than the low costs, it is reproducible and precise and therefore ideal for evolution of therapy in lymphedema.

Assessment Modalities for Lower Extremity Edema, Lymphedema, and Lipedema: A Scoping Review.

Lower extremity swelling may be broadly characterized as due to edema, lymphedema, or lipedema. Differentiation between these three conditions is important for providing appropriate treatment. This review analyzes and compares different clinical diagnostic modalities for these conditions, with the aim of assisting in the process of choosing the most appropriate diagnostic modality by highlighting the advantages and limitations of each. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for a systematic search of peer-reviewed literature, the following diagnostic methods for lower extremity swelling were investigated: (1) ultrasound (US), (2) lymphoscintigraphy (LSG), (3) computed tomography (CT), (4) bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS), (5) tissue dielectric constant (TDC), and (6) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL). The databases used in the search were PubMed, ProQuest, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science, Embase, and Biomedical Reference Collection. After retrieving 115 studies based on predetermined inclusion criteria, a total of 31 studies were critically evaluated. The main results indicate the following: duplex US is the modality of choice to initially identify lower extremity edema such as deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and venous reflux due to its high sensitivity and specificity. CT venography of the lower extremity appears to bethe preferred option for gynecologic cancer patients with lower extremity swelling post-treatment, as it measures subcutaneous tissue volumes to look for DVTs, lymphoceles, and cancer recurrence. TDC is a recommended modality for a variety of conditions, including edema and lymphedema, in part, due to its noninvasive localized assessment capabilities and ease of use. LSG emerges as an effective imaging modality for lymphedema characterization with minimal invasiveness and high sensitivity and specificity. BIS is widely used to identify and monitor lower extremity lymphedema but has been reported to have low sensitivity and lacks the ability to account for changes in tissue composition such as fibrosis. US and MRL are favored for lipedema diagnosis, with MRL providing comprehensive anatomical and functional insights, albeit with cost and accessibility limitations compared to US. While CT, MRI, US, and TDC are all useful for differentiating lymphedema from lipedema, MRI is the preferred modality due to its anatomical and functional diagnostic capabilities. However, US is a pragmatic alternative for use with obese patients or when MRI is not an option.

Time trend of breast cancer-related lymphedema according to body mass index.

PURPOSE: To clarify how body mass index (BMI) affects the development and temporal trend of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). METHODS: This is a prospective study in which patients with operable breast cancer were registered in a single institute between November 2009 and July 2010. The incidence of lymphedema at 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery was assessed according to BMI, and the trend of newly developed BCRL was examined. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥25 in accordance with the Japan Society for the Study of Obesity. RESULTS: A total of 368 patients were included in this study. The multivariate analysis of the whole population showed that high BMI, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy remained as risk factors for BCRL. Patients with high BMI showed a significantly higher incidence of new lymphedema than those with low BMI at 1 year (p < 00.001) regardless of axillary procedures (39.1 % vs 16.3 % for axillary dissection; 15.6 % vs 1.5 % for sentinel lymph node biopsy) but not at 3 and 5 years. Once BCRL developed, patients with high BMI showed slow recovery and 50.0 % of the patients retained edema at 5 years while patients with low BMI showed rapid recovery and 26.7 % retained after 3 years (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The preoperative BMI affected the incidence and temporal trend of BCRL regardless of axillary procedures or radiotherapy. Patients with high BMI should be given appropriate information about BCRL before surgery with careful follow-up for BCRL after treatment.

Sensitivity of Each Index of Doppler, Cross, Uncollapsible, Parallel, and Superficial Fascia in Lymphatic Ultrasound.

Background: Recently, the usefulness of lymphatic ultrasound has been reported. It is beneficial not only to identify lymphatic vessels but also to evaluate lymphatic degeneration and diagnose lymphedema. We previously proposed D-CUPS (Doppler, Cross, Uncollapsible, Parallel, and Superficial fascia) to identify the lymphatic vessels on ultrasound. The purpose of this study was to clarify the sensitivity of each index of D-CUPS. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 27 patients (44 limbs, 98 sites) with lower extremity lymphedema, who underwent lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA). We performed a lymphatic ultrasound the day before surgery. We used a linear probe commonly used for venous ultrasound (Noblus EUP-L65; Hitachi Medical Corp., Tokyo, Japan). We applied the D-CUPS index to identify the lymphatic vessels on ultrasound. We checked whether lymphatic vessels consistent with preoperative lymphatic ultrasound findings were observed during the LVA. We also calculated the sensitivity of each D-CUPS index. Results: All the 27 patients were women, with a mean age of 59.7 years. Totally, 98 incisions were made (59 incisions on the thigh and 39 incisions on the lower leg). During LVA, lymphatic vessels consistent with the preoperative lymphatic ultrasound findings were observed at all the sites. The sensitivities of each indicator of D-CUPS were 100.0%, 100.0%, 68.4%, 19.4%, and 100.0%, respectively. Conclusion: The sensitivity was 100.0% in D, C, and S. Although each index separately was not perfect, by combining them appropriately, we were able to identify lymphatic vessels with certainty.

The value of the dermal rim sign on nonenhanced MRI for predicting dermal backflow in patients with primary lower extremity lymphedema.

PURPOSE: The dermal rim sign (DRS) on nonenhanced MRI has been shown to predict dermal backflow (DBF) in patients with secondary upper limb lymphedema. However, whether DRS has the same effects on primary lower extremity lymphedema (PLEL) has not been clearly reported. Therefore, this study aimed to explore whether the DRS can be used to diagnose the DBF on lymphoscintigraphy in patients with PLEL. METHODS: Ninety-four patients who were diagnosed with PLEL were recruited for this retrospective study from January 2022 to December 2023. According to the findings of the lymphoscintigraphy, all patients were divided into two groups: non-DBF and DBF. The MRI data of the two groups were recorded and statistically compared for the following indicators: range of lymphedema involvement (left, right, whole lower limbs, only thigh, only calf+ankle), signs of lymphedema (notable thickening of skin, parallel line sign, grid sign, honeycomb sign, band sign, lymph lake sign, crescent sign, dermal rim sign), and lymphedema (skin thickness, band width). The dermal rim sign is characterized by notable thickening of the skin+grid sign/honeycomb sign (one or both of which appear)+band sign. RESULTS: The following statistically significant differences in the following indicators were found between the two groups (P<0.05): notable skin thickening, parallel line sign, grid sign, honeycomb sign, band sign, dermal rim sign, skin thickness and band width. The sensitivity of predicting DBF with the DRS was 82%, the specificity was 64%, and the accuracy was 77%. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed good consistency between the DRS and DBF from the perspective of imaging; this tool is suitable for children, adolescents, and patients with contraindications to lymphoscintigraphy. The DRS has important value in assessing the severity of PLEL. DRS is suggested for the clinical use of combined surgical treatment for PLEL.

The Effect of Exercise on Reducing Lymphedema Severity in Breast Cancer Survivors.

Exercise has been repeatedly shown to be safe and beneficial for cancer survivors. However, there is no normative guideline for exercise prescription, and it is still under exploration. Therefore, this literature review aims to provide some advice for the formulation of exercise prescriptions for patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) from the perspective of reducing lymphedema severity. A review of relevant studies published before November 2023 was conducted using three scientific databases: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. A total of 2696 articles were found. Eventually, 13 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this literature review. We concluded that daily, or nearly daily, exercise at home can be recommended. Moreover, reduced lymphedema severity may not be maintained after ceasing the exercise program, so exercise should be a lifelong practice.

Arm lymphedema after vascularized lymph node harvest following Covid-19 vaccination.

There is evidence that COVID-19 vaccines may affect the lymphatic system. We report a case of a 40-year-old female who had undergone lymph node transfer for treating primary lymphedema of the legs. Six months later, the patient developed lymphedema of the right arm closely related to mRNA vaccination against COVID-19.

Psychometric Evaluation of the Bahasa Malaysia Version of the Lymphedema Functioning, Disability, and Health Questionnaire for Upper Limb Lymphedema in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.

Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is the most prevalent comorbidity that occurs following breast cancer treatments and has negative impact on the patients' quality of life (QoL). The Lymphedema Functioning, Disability, and Health Questionnaire for Upper Limb Lymphedema (Lymph-ICF-UL) is a valid and reliable instrument in assessing the QoL of patients with BCRL. However, the Bahasa Malaysia (BM) version is not available yet. This study aimed to translate the Lymph-ICF-UL into BM and to evaluate its validity and reliability. Methods and Results: A forward-backward translation was performed based on Sousa's guideline, and then, the face, content, construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were tested. Face validity was assessed by five patients, and content validity was evaluated by six experts. Then, construct validity and internal validity were assessed in 107 patients. Finally, test-retest reliability was analyzed in 21 patients. Two items were eliminated following suggestions from the patients and experts. All patients found the scoring system and items clear and relevant. The results showed sufficient content validity index and modified kappa statistics value. Confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable fit indices. Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.67 to 0.95, intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.88 to 0.99, standard error measurement was 2.29-6.15, and the Bland-Altman plot showed an agreement between two test occasions. Conclusion: These results suggested that the Lymph-ICF-UL BM has good validity and reliability in evaluating the QoL of patients with BCRL in Malaysia.

Concordance between preoperative imaging methods in patients with limb lymphedema undergoing supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis.

OBJECTIVE: Supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) is increasingly being recognized as a first-line treatment for limb lymphedema because it is minimally invasive and highly effective. Lymphoscintigraphy and indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography are the two most commonly performed diagnostic imaging examinations to establish the indication and plan the procedure in patients affected by limb lymphedema. In a small group of patients, the information between these two imaging tools can be discordant, showing different anatomical drainage pathways or showing absence of drainage and dermal backflow in one examination, and valid drainage pathways in the other. The purpose of this study is to examine the types of possible discrepancies between lymphoscintigraphy of the superficial system and ICG lymphography, and to describe the surgical outcome after LVA in patients presenting such discrepancies. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of all patients who underwent LVA for upper or lower limb lymphedema between July 2015 and July 2023. From this series, we identified a group of patients who had non-concordant imaging results from lymphoscintigraphy and ICG-L prior to lymphatic surgery. Non-concordant findings were described in terms of "pattern discordance" or "pathway discordance". Surgical outcome was measured by the change in mean circumference of the limb after surgery. The changes between preoperative and postoperative limbs' measures were analyzed by Student's t-test. P values<0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients with limb lymphedema exhibited inconsistencies between preoperative lymphoscintigraphy of the superficial system and ICG lymphography. Among these patients, 14 experienced "pattern discordance", while 13 had "pathway discordance", and 1 patient had both. After LVA, we observed a significant reduction in the average circumference of the affected limb in the analyzed group. CONCLUSIONS: The discrepancy of information between lymphoscintigraphy and ICG lymphography in the preoperative study of patients affected by limb lymphedema is rare but possible. This phenomenon is still not fully explained, but our results suggest that it does not correlate with the outcome of supermicrosurgical lymphovenous anastomoses.

Toxicity evaluation of dose-escalation in hypofractionated regional nodal irradiation for breast cancer: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Regional nodal irradiation (RNI) to the axilla and supraclavicular area presents distinct toxicities, such as lymphedema and shoulder stiffness, compared to whole-breast irradiation. There is insufficient evidence on the safety of dose-escalation in hypofractionated RNI. We aimed to evaluate and compare toxicity rates in patients with breast cancer who received hypofractionated RNI with and without dose-escalation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 381 patients with breast cancer treated with hypofractionated RNI between March 2015 and February 2017. Patients received either the standard-dose to the regional nodal area (43.2 Gy/16 fx; 48.7 Gy3.5 EQD2, 2 Gy equivalent dose with α/ß=3.5 Gy) or dose-escalation with a median dose of 54.8 Gy3.5 EQD2 (range, 51.7 - 60.9 Gy3.5 EQD2) depending on clinical and pathologic nodal stage. Toxicity rates of lymphedema and shoulder stiffness were assessed, and statistical analyses were conducted to identify associated factors. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 32.3 months (5.7 - 47.0 months). After radiotherapy, 71 (18.6%) patients developed lymphedema, and 48 (12.6%) developed shoulder stiffness. Patients who received dose-escalation exhibited significantly higher rates of lymphedema (32.1% vs. 14.8%; Odds Ratio (OR): 2.72, p=0.0004) and shoulder stiffness (23.8% vs. 9.4%; OR: 2.01, p=0.0205) compared to the standard-dose group. Moreover, dose-escalation showed a tendency to increase the severity of lymphedema and shoulder stiffness. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received dose-escalation in hypofractionated RNI face a higher risk of developing lymphedema and shoulder stiffness compared to those who received standard-dose hypofractionated RNI. Therefore, it is crucial to implement close and frequent monitoring for early detection, along with timely rehabilitation interventions for these patients.

Improving quality of life after breast cancer: a comparison of two microsurgical treatment options for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL).

PURPOSE: Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) entails the autologous relocation of lymph nodes to a lymphedematous region of the body, whereas lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) creates a direct bypass between the lymphatic and venous system. Both techniques are meant to lastingly bolster the local lymphatic drainage capacity. This study compared safety and effectiveness of VLNT and LVA in patients with chronic breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from our encrypted database composed of patients with chronic BCRL who were treated with either VLNT or LVA and had a minimum follow-up of two years. Patient-specific variables analyzed included pre- and postoperative arm circumferences, lymphedema stages and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 96 patients demonstrated a complete follow-up period of two years. The VLNT group displayed larger preoperative circumferential measurements, evident in both in the isolated examination of the affected arm, as well as when adjusted for the contralateral unaffected arm. Significant reduction in arm volume was achieved by both groups. However, VLNT demonstrated superior relative reduction rates than LVA, neutralizing any significant arm size disparities after 24 months. Surgery duration was slightly longer for VLNT than LVA. Postoperative complications, predominantly minor, were exclusively observed in the VLNT group. CONCLUSIONS: Both VLNT and LVA offer significant improvement for patients suffering from chronic BCRL. VLNT shows an even greater potential for improvement in more severe cases of BCRL, but involves a higher risk for (mostly minor) complications.